The main problem with judicial tinkering is that you don`t have an objective perspective on your own case, so you become blind to the weakness of your case. So convince yourself that a great precedent you`ve found online will solve all your problems, when you should really focus on whether you have enough evidence to prove or defend your case. Lawyers can offer this perspective. Yes, lawyers are expensive. But if you can`t afford it, consider trying to settle your case at all costs, rather than taking it to court yourself, because you risk losing. Even if you shouldn`t lose. It is not only important to find a lawyer who understands the law, but also to hire one who has litigation experience. The comfort of your lawyer in a courtroom can have a direct impact on how your case ends. Spolin Law P.C. is headed by attorney Aaron Spolin, a former prosecutor and award-winning criminal lawyer.

He ranks in the top 1% of criminal lawyers in California and is recognized by the American Institute of Criminal Law Attorneys as one of the “Top 10 Criminal Law Attorneys” in California. His awards directly reflect the recognition of his peers and the legal industry that he is a powerful criminal procedure lawyer. Attorney Don Nguyen With more than two decades of experience in criminal defense, Mr. Nguyen is one of the top litigators in California. He regularly uses his legal knowledge to aggressively litigate cases for his clients. He has managed to have many cases dismissed by the court, nor has he been convicted for clients facing heavy criminal penalties. I`m certainly not writing this to stimulate lawyers` business. At least those I know in Canada already have a lot of work to do.

Rather, I write to, hopefully, help at least a few people not only lose winnable lawsuits, but also deal with potentially crippling and massive negative costs in court – hundreds of thousands of dollars – because in most jurisdictions in Canada (with the exception of Quebec) this is a “lose-pay” system (except for law enforcement) where you can pay at least 60% of the party`s legal fees. winner. which can be considerable. There are many tasks to accomplish before the case is finally fulfilled. Tasks such as reviewing files, scoring important points, analyzing costs, preparing for the jury, etc. are important before the case is performed directly in front of the jury. The award-winning lawyers at Spolin Law, P.C. are more than criminal defense attorneys. They are litigators. They know how to use available information to dismiss cases, exclude inappropriate evidence, and win cases. You can read more about their accomplishments on the Awards, Media and Publications page.

As a lawyer, you must have a good command of general verbal and communication skills. Without communication skills, it is not possible to win or present a case in the courtroom. One of California`s top criminal lawyers, Aaron Spolin, puts it quite simply when explaining how to win a criminal case: “You need a three-part approach: (1) file legal `motions` to dismiss the case, (2) plead for the exclusion of evidence, and (3) clearly explain to the jury why the client is innocent.” This strategy has been successful for many of his former clients. (Of course, past success is not a “guarantee” of the same outcome in a future case.) Lawyers often have confident and powerful personalities. Make sure you are the one running your legal case. Avoid sending mixed signals to your lawyer, such as what kind of negotiated solution would be acceptable to you. Speak up and make sure you are in control of your case. The first phase of achieving a win-win outcome in court begins with documentation. Your hypothesis of the case is the thing you accepted regarding what happened and why. You should support each important reality of your case with evidence that should affect your request or response. All documents must be compiled and kept together. In this blog, you`ll get clear ideas and tips on how to win a case and implement some of the best strategies as you move forward in the follow-up of your case.

Although we speak of “court,” the reality is that judges are far more concerned with determining facts based on admissible evidence than with uncovering obscure legal principles. Most laws are actually quite simple – contracts are binding written or oral agreements between two people; a tort involves harm caused to a person by another person; The foundations of family law include what is fair in terms of division of property, earning capacity and time spent with children; Crimes involve conduct prohibited by law, but the facts associated with that law can be devilishly complicated. How is a court that only has the parties before it for a few hours or days supposed to understand all the intricacies of a personal or professional relationship that could have spanned decades? Many tasks must be performed to run a smooth file in a process, including keeping all necessary documents in one place, estimating the total cost of the case, studying the competition, investigating, etc. Some cases are fairly easy to deal with, but complicated cases require serious planning, as the jury can ask questions and the lawyer often loses a case due to the neglect of certain documents. While evidence is still more important than laws to win your case, you also need to determine what is the most important legal principle you are fighting in court.